How to Make Data Privacy Real

This text is a part of the On Tech e-newsletter. You may sign up here to obtain it weekdays.

The U.S. authorities final week settled with an app that lets ladies monitor their durations over claims that it shared its customers’ well being info with Google and Fb. A photograph-storage app additionally settled claims that it used people’s images to build a facial recognition system.

These app makers obtained in hassle not as a result of what they did appeared creepy — however as a result of they weren’t upfront about it.

In the USA, so long as firms don’t mislead their clients, there aren’t many authorized limits on what they’ll do with our personal info.

That’s not nice, is it? However California has a comparatively new data privacy law that — whereas awkward and flawed — is beginning to present intriguing methods to empower Individuals to restrict how our knowledge can be utilized.

Final week, the Federal Commerce Fee mentioned that the ladies’s app, Flo Well being, broke its promise to its customers to maintain their info personal when it shared sensitive data including women’s pregnancy status with other companies.

Based on the phrases of the settlement, Flo is now required to acquire individuals’s consent earlier than it shares their well being info. (Flo didn’t admit it did something unsuitable. The corporate mentioned that it doesn’t share customers’ well being knowledge with out permission.)

Individuals ought to be capable of select which firms to belief with our private info so long as they’re trustworthy about what they’re doing. Nonetheless, it’s usually an all-or-nothing, complicated alternative: Both say sure to a vaguely worded privateness doc, or don’t use the web site or app in any respect.

And it feels weird to me that if Flo simply releases a brand new privateness coverage, it then can share ladies’s intimate info. However that’s largely the way it works in the USA. Corporations can do just about no matter they need regarding their customers’ knowledge in the event that they first define their actions in a privateness coverage.

The California Consumer Privacy Act, which went into impact a 12 months in the past, is beginning to chart a promising various path.

Below the legislation, state residents — and in some instances, all Individuals — can demand that giant firms show people what data they have about you and whom they’ve shared it with. Individuals may instruct the businesses to delete and never “promote” the information they’ve about you. (There isn’t settlement on the authorized definition of “promoting.”)

The legislation isn’t good, and it’s complicated. Individuals should go to every group that may have their knowledge to delete or limit what it may do with it.

However the California legislation additionally envisioned the potential for “licensed brokers” that might train knowledge rights on our behalf. As a substitute of you filling out 100 varieties to ask 100 firms to delete your knowledge, you’ll decide a privateness assistant to do it for you. Consumer Reports last month started offering to be a privacy assistant as a test project.

Essentially the most intriguing thought is that the privacy assistant might just be a web browser where you check a box once and every web site you go to then will get an automatic discover to ban the non-public info collected there from being shared or bought. Consider it as a model of the telemarketer “Do Not Name” listing.

Up to now, a couple of web sites have began to add this privacy agent feature. (The New York Instances is among the organizations involved, both helping to develop the browser specs and agreeing to implement individuals’s decisions.) If California determines that this type of privateness agent is legally binding, I anticipate this venture to develop.

These privateness concepts are simply getting off the bottom. However I’m intrigued by the potential for giving Individuals actual energy over our digital lives.

Tip of the Week

Troubleshooting your silly (GAHHHH!) printer

Many Individuals working from residence throughout the pandemic bought printers — and with that always got here cursing and screaming. Brian X. Chen, the New York Instances private expertise columnist, is right here to assist:

Printers are in all probability the worst expertise product ever made. My first job out of school concerned reviewing printers for a small tech journal. So I do know greater than I ever needed to concerning the machines. Listed below are some widespread issues and options:

My wi-fi printing stopped working: Final week you printed that Amazon return label over your Wi-Fi community. At present you may’t. Why?

Sometimes, printers go into sleep mode and disconnect out of your web community. Typically, restarting the printer will get it going once more.

One other risk is that the printer modified its IP handle — the figuring out quantity assigned to every internet-connected machine — and now your pc can’t discover it. You may repair this by going into the superior settings of your web router and setting a static IP handle for the printer. (Do a Google seek for the make and mannequin of your router and directions on setting a static IP.)

I get an error when I attempt to print: That is widespread and maddening. Typically the issue is outdated software program. Do an internet search in your printer mannequin to search for what are referred to as new drivers or firmware updates and comply with the directions to replace the software program.

I run out of ink too rapidly: This could occur for those who purchased an off-brand ink cartridge. If this turns into a recurring drawback, attempt switching to a special model — ideally the ink cartridge made by the printer’s producer.

One other risk is that the printer software program is misfiring and the printer mistakenly states that it’s out of ink. Once more, a firmware or driver replace may assist.

Lastly, keep in mind the golden rule of printers: When unsure, reboot your printer and the machine you’re attempting to print from. That generally makes the problems go away.

Earlier than we go …

• Extra on a potential smoking gun within the Google antitrust lawsuit: One of many intriguing claims in a authorities antitrust lawsuit in opposition to Google is that the corporate and Fb teamed up to help their businesses on the expense of everybody else’s. New reporting by my colleagues Dai Wakabayashi and Tiffany Hsu discovered that Google gave Facebook preferential treatment in computerized promoting auctions and that the 2 firms anxious they is perhaps investigated for decreasing competitors consequently.

• Saying you’re doing one thing is just not the identical as doing it: Fb has mentioned that it stopped robotically recommending individuals be part of the sorts of partisan political or social teams that generally steer individuals to excessive concepts. An evaluation of some Fb customers’ information feeds by the Markup discovered the positioning did not actually stop those automatic recommendations.

• It’s an opportune time to wallow in nostalgia: On eBay, you may indulge in a childhood love of Sassy magazine.

Hugs to this

Two teams of penguins — one going to the water and the opposite coming again — stop for a chat. (OK, I don’t know in the event that they’re chatting. Indulge my creativeness.)

We wish to hear from you. Inform us what you consider this text and what else you’d like us to discover. You may attain us at ontech@nytimes.com.

In case you don’t already get this text in your inbox, please sign up here.